According to @BitMEXResearch, a 64 byte Bitcoin transaction can be confused with an intermediate hashing step in Bitcoin’s Merkle tree because both are 64 bytes, creating a vulnerability that can be exploited (source: @BitMEXResearch on X, Dec 9, 2025). According to @BitMEXResearch, the research also reviews a proposed fix to prevent this ambiguity (source: @BitMEXResearch on X, Dec 9, 2025).

According to @adam3us, he posted a metaphorical line about Bitcoin’s Merkle tree on Sep 13, 2025, without any price levels, metrics, or technical updates, indicating no new market-moving information in the post itself. Source: Adam Back on X https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1966891802826600742 For trading context, the post is sentiment-only and offers no on-chain data, regulatory developments, or protocol change details that would constitute a direct signal for position adjustments. Source: Adam Back on X https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1966891802826600742 The reference to the Merkle tree highlights a core Bitcoin data structure that secures transaction integrity, but the post provides no actionability on timing or catalysts for BTC traders. Source: Adam Back on X https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1966891802826600742; Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin whitepaper https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf